La India renueva la criptohostilidad con una nueva propuesta de prohibición

La India anunció sus planes de aprobar una nueva legislación que pretende prohibir todas las criptodivisas privadas en la India durante la primera sesión parlamentaria de presupuestos del año, que se reanudó el 30 de enero de 2021.

Según una declaración oficial de la cámara baja del parlamento, el proyecto de ley propuesto presentará un marco para el desarrollo de una rupia digital oficial que será emitida por el Banco de la Reserva de la India. El proyecto de ley también contendrá varias excepciones que permitirán la promoción de la tecnología blockchain en el país.

Según se informa, el banco central está explorando la necesidad de una versión digital de su moneda fiduciaria y su metodología de implementación.

El „irreal“ ambiente anti cripto de la India

La India tiene una relación hostil de larga data con las monedas digitales como Bitcoin, a pesar de tener el centro tecnológico de más rápido crecimiento en el mundo, incluido el desarrollo y la adopción de la tecnología blockchain.

El RBI (banco central) del país emitió por primera vez una prohibición de las transacciones de criptodivisas en 2018, que prohibía a todos los bancos del país tratar con negocios de cripto. Sin embargo, las criptobolsas tomaron represalias con una demanda y ganaron dos años después, en marzo de 2020.

El Tribunal Supremo de la India levantó la prohibición de dos años sobre el bitcoin y otras criptodivisas tras declararla inconstitucional. La medida fue muy celebrada por los inversores, los desarrolladores y los usuarios de criptodivisas, e inmediatamente vio a muchos inversores reactivar sus negocios de criptomonedas, así como atraer otras múltiples inversiones nuevas en la floreciente industria de blockchain del país.

Desde el levantamiento de la prohibición de las criptodivisas, el volumen de negociación de Bitcoin y otras monedas digitales en las bolsas locales se disparó. En diciembre de 2020, los indios estaban gastando millones en transacciones de criptografía diarias que aumentaron el volumen de comercio en un 500% en 10 meses, según datos de CoinGecko.

La criptocomunidad india pide diálogo con los reguladores

El rumor sobre una posible nueva prohibición de las criptodivisas se informó a principios de agosto de 2020, solo cinco meses después de que los tribunales indios levantaran la prohibición. El sitio web indio Money control informó el 4 de agosto de 2020 que el Banco de la Reserva de la India y otros dos ministerios del gobierno se estaban preparando para aprobar una nueva ley para prohibir el comercio de cripto.

„Una vez que el parlamento se reanude para la sesión, esperamos que [la ley] sea ratificada“, dijo un funcionario.

El informe aclara además que la prohibición implicaría un cambio en la legislación para evitar otro vuelco de los tribunales indios al hacerla legalmente vinculante.

„Definirá claramente la ilegalidad del comercio“.

En medio del auge de la criptoindustria y de la incierta atmósfera regulatoria, la vibrante criptocomunidad india liderada por el criptointercambio BuyUCoin lanzó un enfoque de caja de arena en octubre de 2020. La caja de arena permitiría a las plataformas de criptomonedas operar en una parte aislada del mercado, pero bajo supervisión regulatoria.

La caja de arena también tiene como objetivo someter los criptoactivos a la regulación financiera existente, al tiempo que permite a las nuevas empresas desarrollarse en un entorno supervisado.

Russia’s largest bank to launch its own stablecoin

Russia’s largest bank, Sberbank, plans to launch a blockchain-based financial platform as well as a stablecoin. Would Russia finally become crypto-friendly?

Sberbank launches its stablecoin

In Russia, Sberbank has just asked the country’s central bank for authorization to deploy a blockchain-based financial platform , as well as a stablecoin .

This platform and its stablecoin will be aimed at Sberbank partner companies, not individuals. The bank is also said to have taken this initiative in response to an increasingly growing demand from its employees.

It should be noted that the country’s central bank is the majority shareholder of Sberbank . In addition, many members of the government like German Gref and Anton Siluanov are on the supervisory board of SberBank. So many peculiarities that will undoubtedly help Sberbank’s request to succeed.

The largest bank in Russia today, Sberbank is also the third largest European banking institution in terms of capitalization. Sberbank’s press service told Coindesk :

“This stablecoin will allow companies to use smart contracts on Sberbank’s platform, based on the Hyperledger Fabric blockchain. Tokenizing material goods and cash on this platform will allow full automation of transactions.

This stablecoin will unsurprisingly be backed by the Russian ruble and should see the light of day in June 2021 at the latest.

A country yet hostile to cryptocurrencies

Will the upcoming arrival of Sberbank’s stablecoin reshuffle the cards in Russia? Indeed, the country has been rather hostile to cryptocurrencies for many years.

For example, retail investors are not allowed to buy more than $ 7,750 in cryptocurrency each year . A rather surprising measure which aims to prevent the flight of capital to these assets.

Another notable example is that investors who do not report their cryptocurrencies to the authorities are subject to very heavy penalties, such as fines and even prison terms in the most extreme cases .

However, one notable difference concerns Sberbank’s future stablecoin and cryptocurrencies in the government’s sights. As the bank is owned by the Russian state, the latter can fully control and monitor the development of its stablecoin.

Russia is working on a digital version of the ruble , like many other banks around the world with their local currency.

The authorities are therefore hostile towards cryptocurrencies over which they cannot control, such as Bitcoin (BTC) or other currencies issued by private companies.

At first glance, everything suggests that the arrival of Sberbank’s stablecoin will not be a game-changer for retail investors. The cryptocurrency industry in Russia will remain as closely watched as before.

Banca Generali invierte en el proveedor de carteras de bitcoin Conio

La Banca Generali de Italia ha adquirido una participación en el proveedor de carteras criptográficas Conio como principal inversor en un aumento de capital de 14 millones de dólares para la empresa, que ofrece servicios de custodia, negociación e información centrados actualmente en el bitcoin.

Prometiendo un proceso de apertura de cuenta de 30 segundos, la Cartera Bitcoin de Conio permite a los usuarios comprar bitcoin con una tarjeta de crédito y transferir sus activos a través de una transferencia bancaria.

Los fundadores de la compañía tienen un fuerte pedigrí en servicios financieros. Conio Inc. fue fundada en 2015 en San Francisco por Christian Miccoli, anteriormente de CheBanca!, ING Direct, y McKinsey, y Vincenzo di Nicola que aporta experiencia de Microsoft y la Universidad de Stanford, y como fundador de GoPago, que actúan como co-directores generales de la empresa. Conio actualmente sirve más de 150.000 carteras de criptodólares para clientes italianos.

El ejercicio de construcción de apuestas, completado en diciembre de 2020, se adelantó al aumento récord del valor de bitcoin, que superó la marca de los 35.000 dólares a principios del año nuevo y ayer alcanzó un nuevo máximo de 38.000 dólares.

Banca Generali dice que tiene la intención de ofrecer la cartera Conio a los clientes como parte de su gama de servicios de gestión de patrimonio.

El director general de Banca Generali, Gian Maria Mossa, afirma: „Esta es una importante asociación industrial tanto desde el punto de vista tecnológico como de la gestión. El acuerdo con la Conio significa una ampliación de los servicios ofrecidos a nuestros clientes y la colaboración con un socio orientado a la innovación. También quiero destacar la gran atención que la Conio presta a los aspectos de seguridad y regulación, que han sido claves para la creación de esta asociación“.

Christian Miccoli, co-director general de la Conio, añade: „Este acuerdo con la Banca Generali es un paso significativo hacia una nueva era para todo el sistema financiero, con instituciones financieras más tradicionales que abren el camino a la colaboración entre los actores establecidos y los nuevos. Después de diez años de desarrollo y estabilización industrial, las criptas entran ahora en una nueva fase tangible, debutando en la gama de servicios de las instituciones financieras“.

Federal government sees little need for action

A Bitcoin stands upright in front of the German parliament

The recent bull run in Bitcoin and Co. is arousing the interest of many private and institutional investors. In Germany, too, the digital store of value as well as other cryptocurrencies are enjoying increasing attention. However, a question from the FDP parliamentary group in the Bundestag reveals that the federal government is still struggling with the taxation of cryptocurrencies.

Currently, the federal government sees little need for tax changes for cryptocurrencies. This emerges from a question from FDP parliamentary group politician Frank Schäffler to the Federal Ministry of Finance, which BTC-ECHO has received. According to this, the federal government is not currently planning any legal changes of its own regarding the purchase of or Bitcoin Storm payment with cryptocurrencies. It would prefer to follow the EU’s Markets in Crypto Assets Regulation (MiCA), which is currently being planned. The legislative proposal provides, for example, that providers of crypto services should be subject to ongoing supervision. According to the regulation, these services would also include exchange trading on crypto exchanges.

When asked how to treat the purchase of goods and services with cryptocurrencies for tax purposes, the federal government responded:

How to assess the use of cryptocurrencies for the purchase of goods and services for income tax purposes is currently being coordinated between the Federal Ministry of Finance and the supreme tax authorities of the Länder. After the discussion is concluded, a BMF letter coordinated between the federal government and the states will be published.

Earn a passive income with ArbiSmart’s interest-bearing wallet and fully automated Crypto Arbitrage trading system. Benefit from an EU-licensed and regulated platform that offers investments with returns between 10.8% and 45% per year

According to Frank Schäffler, this vote has not seen any significant progress for eight years now. Regarding the hardly noticeable initiative of the German government regarding cryptocurrencies, the FDP politician says:

Interest in cryptocurrencies is currently growing massively. But the federal government shows no interest in providing citizens in Germany with a secure legal framework for acquisition and taxation

Federal government hardly provides any new insights into Diem

There are also few new findings from the federal government regarding the stablecoin Diem from the Facebook consortium. When asked for an assessment of the planned introduction of Diem in Switzerland, the Finance Ministry referred to the so-called „Diem College“, which was founded on the initiative of the Swiss FINMA and of which BaFin is also a member. Its task is primarily the exchange of information. In this respect, for example, the prudential requirements have been addressed in order to approve Diem as a payment system. However, the demands are not formulated further. The federal government refers to a statement by the Diem Association in which the consortium announced that it would only take up its activities if the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA approved the stablecoin. However, a decision by the financial supervisory authority is not yet foreseeable.

In response to further questions from the FDP parliamentary group, the letter from the federal government referred to „insufficient information“ on the part of Diem, on the basis of which no precise details could be formulated. Meanwhile, at the G7 meeting in December, Finance Minister Olaf Scholz was not very impressed by the rebranding of the Facebook coin. He even called the Diem a „wolf in sheep’s clothing“. According to the SPD candidate for chancellor, renaming the currency would not solve its fundamental problems. He accuses the Diem organisation and the consortium around Facebook behind it of not having tackled the regulatory risks decisively enough. The German government will not accept a market entry as long as these deficits are not remedied.

Bitcoinin ja Ethereumin on taisteltava ATH: n jälkeisten myyntien kanssa

BTC: llä ja ETH: lla on myyntihintoja Bitcoinin kaikkien aikojen korkeimman tason seurauksena, mutta mielipiteet ovat edelleen nousussa.

Ketjumittarit paljastavat, että vaikka BTC-valaat ovat menneet myyntitilaisuuteen, Bitcoin voi palautua ja lisätä voittoja.
Toisaalta Ethereumin tekniset tiedot osoittavat, että ETH voi hypätä yli 30% lähitulevaisuudessa.
Bitcoinin viime aikojen kaikkien aikojen korkeimmat arvot voivat olla vastuussa näistä suuntauksista, koska asiantuntijat ehdottavat, että sijoittajien on aika saada voittoja.

Salausvaluuttamarkkinat alkoivat tällä viikolla hintojen laskulla Bitcoinin viimeaikaisten kaikkien aikojen korkeimpien jälkimainingeissa. Vaikka Bitcoin ja Ethereum ovat merkittävästi jäljittäneet viimeisten 24 tunnin aikana, molemmat kryptovaluutat pitävät tärkeiden tukitasojen yläpuolella, jotka voivat määrittää, mihin he ovat menossa seuraavaksi.

Bitcoinin on oltava tärkeimmän tuen yläpuolella

Bitcoinin nousutrendi näyttää saavuttaneen uupumisen, kun hinnat nousivat uuteen kaikkien aikojen korkeimpaan tasoon, 24 400 dollariin 20. joulukuuta. Siitä lähtien kryptovaluutan hinta on laskenut yli 6,50%. Laskusuhde työnsi Bitcoinin kriittiselle tukitasolle, joka määrittää, voivatko hinnat laskea edelleen.

IntoTheBlockin IOMAP-mallin perusteella 22660 dollarin tukimuuri merkitsee paljon merkitystä Bitcoinin trendille. Tapahtumahistoria osoittaa, että lähes 478 000 osoitetta on aiemmin ostanut yli 560 000 BTC: tä tämän hinnan ympärillä.

Tällainen elintärkeä kysyntäalue voi omaksua osan viimeaikaisista myyntipaineista ja estää hintojen laskun edelleen. Toisaalta, jos tämä tukitaso rikkoutuu, se voi olla katastrofaalinen sijoittajille, jotka lyövät vetoa ylösalaisin. IOMAP-kohortit osoittavat, että seuraava merkittävä kiinnostuksen alue, joka vahvistaa Bitcoinin nousutrendiä, on noin 20 500 dollaria.

Jos 22660 dollarin tuki katkeaa, BTC: n haltijoiden tulisi odottaa investointiensa laskevan vielä 10%.
Bitcoin-myyntipaineen nousu

Kun otetaan huomioon jyrkemmän korjauksen todennäköisyys, näyttää siltä, ​​että BTC-valaat ovat hyötyneet viimeaikaisesta hintatoiminnasta voittojensa saavuttamiseksi. Santimentin haltijajakaavio osoittaa, että Bitcoinin takana oleva myyntipaine on noussut dramaattisesti viime päivinä.

Todellakin, 1000-10 000 BTC: n omaavien osoitteiden määrä putosi. Noin 31 valasta lähti verkosta tai jakoi rahakkeitaan uudelleen, mikä tarkoittaa 1,40 prosentin laskua niin lyhyessä ajassa.

Ensi silmäyksellä Bitcoin-verkon suurten sijoittajien määrän lasku voi tuntua merkityksettömältä. Kun kuitenkin otetaan huomioon, että näillä valailla on 23–230 miljardia dollaria BTC: ssä, myyntitilausten äkillinen piikki voi kääntyä miljardeiksi dollareiksi.

Jos myyntiräjähdys jatkuu, Bitcoinilla voi olla mahdollisuus leikata 22660 dollarin tukitaso ja pudota 20 500 dollariin.

Tästä synkästä pahimmasta mahdollisesta skenaariosta huolimatta kryptovaluuttamarkkinoiden arvaamattomuus tarkoittaa, että nouseva näkymä ei ole poissuljettua.

IOMAP-malli osoittaa, että Bitcoinilla on vain vähän tai ei lainkaan vastarintaa tulevaisuudessa. Ainoa merkittävä toimitusseinä on 23 500 dollaria, jossa noin 300 000 osoitetta saa yli 90 000 BTC: tä.

Tämän tosiasian valossa pessimististen näkymien mitätöinti ja uusien kaikkien aikojen huippujen nousu eivät välttämättä vaadi valtavia ostopaineita.
Ethereum on valmis hyppäämään 800 dollariin

Ethereum on laskenut viiden viime päivän aikana, mikä on aiheuttanut sen hinnan laskun yli 12%. ETH kävi äskettäin kaupasta uudella vuotuisella korkeimmillaan 678 dollarilla alimpaan 585 dollariin.

Huolimatta niin lyhyessä ajassa aiheutuneista merkittävistä tappioista, ETH näyttää olevan ensisijainen korkeammille korkeuksille. Nousevan kolmion kehitys ETH: n 3 tunnin kaaviossa viittaa siihen, että ostopaineiden nousu nykyisen hintatason ympärillä voisi nähdä Ethereumin palaavan viimeaikaisiin huippuihinsa ja etenemään edelleen.

Itse asiassa Ethereumin hinnat voivat nousta lähes 30% rikkoutuessaan 620 dollarin vastusesteen. Tämä kohde määritetään mittaamalla kolmion kahden korkeimman pisteen välinen etäisyys ja lisäämällä se puhkeamiskohtaan.

TD Sequential -indikaattori viittaa siihen, että Ethereum on sidottu uusiin vuotuisiin korkeuksiin. Tämä tekninen indeksi esitti ostosignaalin vihreän yhdeksän kynttilänjalan muodossa samanaikaisesti

No upper limit? No idea! – “Expert” embarrasses himself with criticism of Bitcoin

With his criticism of Bitcoin, David Rosenberg reveals his lack of understanding of the cryptocurrency.

The current record run of Bitcoin ( BTC ) calls all kinds of commentators on the scene

Although most of them are brimming with praise for the cryptocurrency, there are still critics who are looking for the „fly in the ointment“. For example, David Rosenberg, chief economist, strategist and president of the market research institute Rosenberg Research & Associates, who believes that the amount of gold in circulation is more predictable than that of Bitcoin .

„Everyone is apparently convinced that the upper limit of 21 million currency units is over, but there is nothing in the programming code that stipulates that the amount of Bitcoin in circulation cannot be subsequently increased as soon as we hit this mark“, as Rosenberg stated in an interview with Bloomberg yesterday, Thursday .

Limiting the cryptocurrency to a maximum amount of 21 million currency units in circulation is one of the most important arguments in favor of Bitcoin as a store of value . Until this upper limit is reached, the rate of increase in the amount in circulation will be almost “halved” every four years, which will lead to an increasing shortage. The parameters for this halving and the ultimate upper limit are firmly anchored in the programming code of Bitcoin, which simply makes Rosenberg’s claims wrong.

While the cryptocurrency or the development of the amount in circulation can be calculated, it is unclear how large the final amount of gold in circulation will be

In particular, the rapidly advancing technological progress could increase both the rate of increase and the amount in circulation of the precious metal in the future.

“With gold, we can at least say that we know the development of the supply curve with certainty,” as Rosenberg mentions in an interview as a major advantage of the precious metal. And further: „We do not know the future development of the Bitcoin supply,“ said the economist. And finally: „People say they know, but they don’t.“

Accordingly, he describes the cryptocurrency as a “massive speculative bubble” because investors would not know how Bitcoin supply developed. From this he concludes: „This is classic herd behavior.“

O Bitcoin pode recuperar $19k apesar dos mineiros da BTC venderem suas bolsas

  • Bitcoin está no território dos ursos, pois o Índice de Posição dos Mineiros dá dicas de venda pelos mineiros da BTC
  • A demanda por Bitcoin absorverá rapidamente a venda contínua a estes níveis
  • Bitcoin poderia experimentar um ressurgimento para 19 mil dólares devido a esta demanda de compra e um triângulo ascendente no gráfico de 4 horas

Bitcoin está mais uma vez em território incerto depois de ter saltado para níveis de $18.700 do mínimo local de $17.600 estabelecido apenas ontem. No momento de escrever, a Bitcoin está negociando a $18.200 e poderia estar no meio da impressão de um fundo duplo que poderia catapultar o Rei do Crypto para território familiar acima de $19k.

Os mineiros de Bitcoin estão vendendo seus BTC

O atual ambiente de baixa Bitcoin pode ser atribuído aos mineiros da BTC que vendem suas sacolas a esses níveis. De acordo com os dados na cadeia da equipe da CryptoQuant, o Bitcoin Miners Position Index (MPI) atingiu um pico de três anos. Isto, por sua vez, significa que os mineiros Bitcoin estão muito provavelmente vendendo seus BTC em bolsas ou mercados OTC. A equipe da CryptoQuant compartilhou estas informações através do seguinte tweet e gráfico de acompanhamento demonstrando o aumento do MPI.

Bitcoin Poderia Retestar $19k Apesar de os mineiros venderem

Para a maior parte do terceiro e quarto trimestres de 2020, cada bitcoin dip foi comprado muito rapidamente. Em um comentário recente sobre a ação atual da Bitcoin no mercado, a equipe da Weiss Ratings previu que a Bitcoin acabaria por quebrar o teto de preço de $20k, já que a demanda pelo ativo está rapidamente „consumindo“ a oferta de BTC sendo vendida. A equipe explicou ainda mais suas hipóteses da seguinte forma.

Na última terça-feira, #BTC atingiu $19.845,98, uma alta de 52 semanas, de acordo com a Coinmarketcap. Há muita oferta nestes níveis e é apenas uma questão de tempo até que a demanda comece a comer um pouco disso para cima. É quando veremos a mudança para além dos US$ 20.000 e mais.

Além disso, a equipe da Crypterium Analytics apontou que o recente mergulho de Bitcoin para $17.600 formou um triângulo ascendente que poderia ver Bitcoin alcançar $19.500 ou mesmo $20.000. Abaixo está uma captura de tela do gráfico da equipe da Crypterium e sua explicação mais profunda sobre o mesmo.

O gráfico saiu do triângulo simétrico para baixo, mas isto não significa uma mudança de tendência. A baixa atual ainda é muito maior do que a anterior, que foi em 27 de novembro. Além disso, o preço está em um triângulo ascendente global e agora está formando uma terceira onda….

O mais provável é que o preço atinja o limite superior na faixa de $19.500 – $20.000. Isto pode acontecer antes do final desta semana. Dependendo se o preço ultrapassar o máximo histórico, seremos capazes de julgar a futura tendência da Bitcoin.

Vil Bitcoin drepe kredittkort? Ekta Mourya Publisert for 19 timer siden 13. desember 2020

Etter DeFi har „institusjonelle investorer“ sannsynligvis vært moteordet for kryptomarkedet, spesielt etter at MicroStrategy og Square hopper inn. Ser vi på institusjoner som går på Bitcoin-kjøp, har mange analytikere sagt sitt om hva dette betyr. Den populære amerikanske datavitenskapsmannen Paul Graham er den siste etter at han tvitret,

„Mulig fremtidsscenario: Kredittkortselskaper blir stadig mer kresne om hvem de skal behandle transaksjoner for, og dette blir tingen som tipser allmennheten om å bruke kryptovaluta i transaksjoner, og til slutt dreper kredittkort.“

Er dette mulig? Vel, la oss undersøke det. Til tross for at Bitcoin er priset til over to ganger virkelig verdi, kjøper institusjoner. Den økende interessen for kryptovalutaer, den skarpe plassen, fra slike som PayPal og VISA, har ført til denne spekulasjonen. Faktisk kommenterte medstifteren av BlockSpring @pavtalk også kredittkort og sa:

“Min innsats –

Trinn 1: Bakoverkompatible kryptokort med eksisterende nettverk for å bygge forbrukervolum. Differensier på belønninger

Trinn 2: Onboard-selgere for direkte, øyeblikkelige P2P-betalinger utenfor kjeden, lik FBO Venmo / Cash, men med krypto

Trinn 3: Direkte P2P-betalinger i kjeden ”

Imidlertid er den største utfordringen i dette tilfellet „tilbakeføringsgarantien“, når det er tap eller tyveri, noe som er svært lite sannsynlig i Bitcoin debetkort. I tillegg, på grunn av Bitcoins raskt økende popularitet og veksten av alternative betalinger, er det fullt mulig at desentralisering eller open banking helt vil erstatte det tradisjonelle banksystemet og betalingsleverandørene, inkludert kredittkortselskaper.

Det er flere prosjekter i DeFi-økosystemet, og tokens som tilbyr kredittjenester og flere andre funksjoner på toppen av det gjør det til attraktive priser. For å holde seg relevant og favorisert, kan kredittkortselskaper, sammen med åpne bank-API-er som markedsfører transaksjonsverdien, skape et økosystem som legger til rette for en CBDC. Et annet interessant utfall av Bitcoinisering av banker og betalingsleverandører kan være fremveksten av utlånsprotokoller.

Akkurat som Mastercard ble med i blockchain digital identitetsalliansen i fjor, kan flere kredittkortselskaper komme inn i digital identitetsvirksomhet og utlånsprotokollfelt i krypto, som deretter kan utnytte deres identitetstjenester for å redusere risikoen. Dette vil bane vei for et helt nytt utvalg av utlånsprodukter og protokoller i dette domenet.

Den langsiktige virkningen av institusjonell og bankdeltakelse og interesse for Bitcoin vil være bullish. Imidlertid, på kort sikt, kan prisen korrigere ytterligere basert på kjedeanalysen. Kartet over ubrukte Bitcoins markerte nivået Bitcoins ble akkumulert på.

Vil Bitcoin drepe kredittkort?

Bitcoins som ble akkumulert til varierte prisnivåer fra $ 4000 til $ 19.000, ble ikke brukt på pressetiden. Videre var det ekstra kjøp over $ 18.000-nivået, og de kjøpte Bitcoins ble holdt på utvekslingslommebøker i stedet for å bli trukket tilbake. Bitcoin kan være på vei mot en langvarig prisoppgang, og dette kan muligens drepe kredittkort, med mindre kredittkortselskaper utforsker løsninger som samhandler med kryptovalutaer.

Florida Casino Amendment sieht Unterstützung von 71% der wahrscheinlichen Wähler in der letzten Umfrage

Änderungsantrag 3 wird von 71% der Einwohner Floridas unterstützt , die voraussichtlich bei den bevorstehenden Parlamentswahlen im November ihre Stimme abgeben werden.

Dies geht aus einer kürzlich durchgeführten Umfrage hervor

Änderungsantrag 3, der von der Organisation Voters in Charge angeführt wird, zielt darauf ab, Floridas bestehendes Gesetz so zu ändern, dass keine Entscheidungen im Zusammenhang mit Glücksspielen vom staatlichen Gesetzgeber getroffen werden, ohne dass diese von 60% aller Wähler zuerst genehmigt werden.

Die jüngste Umfrage zu diesem Thema, deren Ergebnisse Anfang dieser Woche veröffentlicht wurden, wurde von Voters in Charge in Auftrag gegeben und von Hill Research Consultants durchgeführt. Das Forschungsunternehmen befragte zwischen dem 18. und 24. Juli 1.209 Personen . Die Interviews wurden online sowie über Mobiltelefone und Festnetztelefone geführt. Hill Research stellte fest, dass 71% aller Befragten wahrscheinlich mit „Ja“ für Änderungsantrag 3 stimmen würden, was bedeutet, dass sie die Kontrolle über Entscheidungen im Zusammenhang mit Glücksspielen unterstützen würden, die an Einwohner des Staates weitergegeben werden sollen. Von allen befragten Personen gaben 18% an, dass sie eine Nein-Stimme abgeben würden.

Eine ähnliche Umfrage von Hill Research im Januar ergab relativ ähnliche Ergebnisse. Bis zu 1.235 wahrscheinliche Wähler wurden damals befragt, und 76% sagten, dass sie Änderungsantrag 3 unterstützen würden , während 19% antworteten, dass sie mit „Nein“ stimmen würden.

Warum wird Änderungsantrag 3 wahrscheinlich erfolgreich sein?

Laut Analysten wird Änderungsantrag 3 bei der bevorstehenden Abstimmung im November wahrscheinlich aus mehreren wichtigen Gründen erfolgreich sein. Erstens waren die Wähler in Florida nach der Legalisierung bestimmter Glücksspieldienste im Bundesstaat Anfang des 20. Jahrhunderts lange Zeit diejenigen gewesen, die über Fragen der Erweiterung des Glücksspiels entschieden hatten. Es war tatsächlich erst vor kurzem, als der Gesetzgeber die volle Kontrolle über diese Entscheidungen übernahm.

Änderungsantrag 3 wurde daher als Maßnahme gefördert, mit der etwas wiederhergestellt werden soll, das zuvor den Menschen in Florida gehört hatte.

Zweitens ist die vorgeschlagene Verfassungsänderung ziemlich einfach und leicht zu verstehen, was sich genau ändern wird, wenn mehr als 60% aller Floridaner , die bei den bevorstehenden Halbzeitwahlen am 6. November eine Stimme abgegeben haben, die notwendige Unterstützung erhalten . Um dies besser zu veranschaulichen, finden Sie hier den Titel und die Zusammenfassung von Änderungsantrag 3:

Wahlkontrolle des Glücksspiels in Florida

Diese Änderung stellt sicher, dass die Wähler in Florida das ausschließliche Recht haben, zu entscheiden, ob sie das Glücksspiel im Casino genehmigen möchten, indem sie verlangen, dass das Glücksspiel im Casino nach dem Gesetz von Florida von den Wählern in Florida gemäß Artikel XI Abschnitt 3 des Florida genehmigt werden muss Verfassung. Betrifft die Artikel X und XI. Definiert das Glücksspiel im Casino und stellt klar, dass diese Änderung nicht im Widerspruch zum Bundesgesetz über staatliche / Stammesverträge steht.

„Bitcoin’s people hate me, but they don’t understand what I’m talking about,“ says Sammy Dana

„I have nothing against Bitcoin or other cryptoactives, they are risky, they can be useful especially at times when the government is spending a lot of money, printing money“, says Samy Dana

Samy Dana is a well-known figure in the Brazilian cryptomarket, and is even a meme in the community because of his negative views on bitcoin in 2017. Recently the economist participated in an episode of the Master Podcast, where he said he has a positive position on digital currency.

For the economist, who has been a Globo commentator, bitcoin, as well as other crypto-currencies „have a giant potential,“ even if he does not consider crypto-currencies to be a „currency,“ since they are not (yet) widely accepted as an exchange system, and Samy also said that they „do not have a reserve value system,“ but that this could change.

„Cryptomorphs are not yet accepted, but does that mean it will always be so? No! I think it’s incredible technology.“

Although he has criticisms about cryptomime and the market, especially about how reckless some people are with their investments, Samy Dana believes that many bitcoin supporters don’t understand what he really means when he warns about the risks of investing in digital currency.

„Bitcoin’s people hate me, but I don’t think they understand what I’m talking about,“ Samy Dana said.

Still explaining his opinion about cryptomorphs, Samy took the opportunity to talk about how his image is seen by the community. The economist is seen as a meme and is known as one of the biggest critics of digital currency in Brazil.

„Bitcoin’s people hate me, but I don’t think they understand what I’m talking about. What do I talk about? That this is a risky asset! Many people can get hurt.

It is: Understand the risks! The worst thing is for you to come in with money without knowing the risk that anything has.

And the risk is linked to the swing“.

Editor’s note: Here at Livecoins nobody hates Samy, we can see that he has some opinions in the 2000s, but he seems to be on his way to becoming a bitcoiner.

For Samy Dana, his stance on the Globe was very important for him to be cautious about what he was talking about; after all, he could reach millions of people who could „make the mistake of investing in the Bitcoin“ without the necessary knowledge about the currency.

„These are risky assets (…) At the time of the Globe when I was ‚hitting Bitcoin‘, first I believed it was a bubble, second I was seeing simple people selling everything to buy Bitcoin thinking they would get rich“.

For him, as a commentator, it was important to educate about this dangerous reasoning, as it can be financially devastating for people with less knowledge or less resources.

„A person who earned R$1,000, with difficulty, why does she think that a business she doesn’t even know what is right will leave her a millionaire? (…)

That’s where there’s a pyramid that uses Bitcoin as a decoy, not Bitcoin’s fault“.

„They can be useful at times when the government is spending a lot of money“
In a very quick but very interesting comment, Samy Dana has shown that he agrees with many Bitcoin bulls who believe that cryptomorphs are a way to protect money from inflation.

„I have nothing against Bitcoin or other cryptoactives, they are risky, they can be useful especially at times when the government is spending a lot of money, printing money“.

This is an interesting opinion that has been held by the Bitcoin community since the world was world.

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)